博鱼(中国·Eurocup)官方网站-Unified Platform

博鱼(中国)官方网站学术
资料总数:321
文献资料:189
员工登录
Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • 摘要:
    Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) has been considered a suitable material for cranioplasty. However, no consensus has been reached concerning the best material for cranioplasty with regard to minimizing complications. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the complication rates of PMMA with those of autologous bone and titanium mesh. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016042725). Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. The focus question was, "Do PMMA prostheses used in cranioplasty have complications rates similar to those of autologous bone and titanium mesh?" A meta-analysis of complication rates was performed on the basis of dichotomous outcomes assessed by risk ratio (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). From 1014 data sources, 11 articles were selected according to eligibility criteria. These articles involved 1,256 individuals and 1,278 cranioplasties using autologous bone (n = 408), PMMA (n = 379), or titanium (n = 151). The follow-up period ranged from 63 days to 54.3 months. No difference was observed between the complication rates of PMMA and autologous bone (p = 0.94; RR, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.54-1.75) or between PMMA and titanium (p = 0.38; RR, 1.59; 95%CI, 0.57-4.48). Sub-analysis of the reasons for craniotomy (trauma/non-trauma) was conducted, which revealed no significant difference (p = 0.91; RR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.37-2.42). The meta-analysis indicated that the use of PMMA yields complication rates that are near those of autologous bone and titanium mesh.
  • 关键词:
    /
  • 作者:
    Rafaella de Souza Leão 1, Juliana Raposo Souto Maior 1, Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo Lemos 2, Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos 3, Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende Montes 1, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer 2, Sandra Lúcia Dantas Moraes 1
  • 作者单位:
    1Universidade de Pernambuco - UPE, Dentistry School, Recife, PE, Brazil. 2Universidade de Pernambuco - UPE, Dentistry School, Programs in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Recife, PE, Brazil. 3Universidade Estadual Paulista - Unesp, School of Dentistry, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
  • 期刊名称:
    Braz Oral Res
  • 期刊级别:
    /
  • 时间:
    2018
  • 技术领域 :
  • PMID:
    29898018
  • DOI:
    10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0031
  • 来源链接:
Employee login
员工登录